This library highlights examples of state laws, policies, initiatives, and programs aligned with whole child design. It is intended to help policymakers, educators, and other key stakeholders learn how states across the country are pursuing whole child policy and systems change. The library is not an exhaustive compilation of all the whole child work states have taken on and will be periodically updated with new examples as states continue to innovate and redesign to support every child’s learning and developmental needs. If you have a state policy example you would like to share, please submit it using this form.
Transforming Learning Environments
Establish Integrated Support Systems
Transforming Learning Environments
Provide High-Quality Expanded Learning Time
Redesigning Curriculum, Instruction, Assessments, and Accountability Systems
Promote Rich Learning Experiences
Several states are investing resources in high-quality, open-source instructional materials as an avenue to support teaching and learning. For example, 10 states—California, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Washington—have partnered with foundations and research-based instructional materials developers to support OpenSciEd, a complete open-educational resources (OER) curriculum in science. By partnering with the instructional materials development effort, states directly inform the scope and sequence, design specifications, and instructional model for the materials. OpenSciEd partner states have also committed substantial resources toward field tests, data collection, and professional learning that support implementation of instructional materials across their states. By doing so, states can ensure that the materials that become available to their districts and teachers are congruent with state policies and priorities—such as adopted standards, curriculum frameworks, state assessment systems, and equitable supports for student subgroups—while also investing in the infrastructure and capacity needed for meaningful adoption and use of those materials in districts and classrooms. As a result, states can honor local control over curricular decisions while creating an enabling environment that encourages the use of high-quality materials. (For more information about this state example, see Redesigning Curriculum, Instruction, Assessments, and Accountability Systems.)